Paul F., “Gustavus,” Vasa-Mountbatten; S.I.D. 15076518; vasa-mountbatten@berkeley.edu;
Psychology 160 Social Psychology, U.C.-B. Summer Session “’09;” Web Based Assignment #2
Harmful Aspects of Social Stratification or, “Taking Advantage,” Individual Opportunities:
Social-Psychological Pitfalls of En Mass Propaganda & Evils of Anti-Social Deception
The phenomena interest being the association of mass social-psychological movements, from a good/bad pair of differing examples, as coupled to the academic psychological realm of referred studies citable from the text as to issues of ethical standards of the person to moral guidelines of, “the masses,” as to a good-sided example for an individual moving up the social strata is to say of prosperous advantage of the capitalist socio-economy, whereas to say of the bad-sided juxtaposed historical consequence in relation to both cycles indicative of depression preceded war, “The Great War,” “W.W.I,” and, “The Great Depression,” preceded, “W.W.II,” is to not be able to do justice to the topics in two pages. Narrowing it down, that Int’l. financial markets have historically been a social-value gauge and determinant precursor of Int’l. conflict and wars, of which our own studies have focused on The Elliott Wave Principle* as academic guide, to which both examples address the negative influences of a hierarchical socio-political stratification per videos. Ideographically, short-term individual scope presumed against the grain of culture, partial societal destruction on paper per number/accounting evaluation as a socio-economic standard eschews tradition consensus that, “Street’s sense,” makes stocks commonly go up (thought-polarization) and only go down in a panic, while during such panic goes a fortune to the/a single (normatively) speculator selling stocks, “Short,” to be obliged to later, “(normally) invest,” to buy them back later is going against the crowd; being that 1% as the only person in the right at a time when 99% of such mob is wrong goes to show in comparison a systematic socio-economic predestined demise of that crowd’s socio-political evaluation as a group compared to the private party launched up such stratification of that worried social organism. The only pitfall necessarily addressed for the individual is the similar discounted valuation of the, “token economy/ic,” tender of current accounts quite lower revaluation of buying value, i.e., a changed accounting relative the fortune made being against the hyper-inflationary re-evaluations inclusive of the individual as also the mass crowd- an Int’l. relative consideration. The epitome example was Rothschild’s standing (message character) at the Telegraph Pole after a British Waterloo victory, taking the carrier pigeon to read the message only to deceptively put in sell orders that were not short-sale orders, but only temporary liquidation orders of his own bought (Long) position to then manipulate the anticipating crowd into the frenzy of a wrong-turn that made his subsequent purchase orders more valuable at an artificial, overly-discounted fabricated price to then buy absolute value and reverse to a correct interpretation within socio-political affect from the later proper construal of militarily decisive effect. This example shows man playing intra-societal numbers games potentially only seeming to help one another but hiding an intent to have a manufactured demise targeted upon others only to behoove self-fulfilling benefit of those few professing, “crisis is opportunity.” Making a deception the attribute of manipulations of times of social dissonance, that when the going gets tough, the dog-eat-dog world comes about to test survival in social positioning- the text stating people will lie to gain advantage. To compare this sequence in relating the studies such as the Stanford Guard-Prisoner Experiment; Ashe Conformity, group lies; Milgram Shock, “learner’s,” misrepresentation, is to question any misuse of Psychology experiment as justified by the Professors, thereby implying the possibility of self-fulfilling rationalization overlooking ethics.
Overly succinct, to now conclude having reduced possibilities of topics worthy of issue in a more sustainable response; misuse of inherently built-in systems, as possible from individuals pre-wired to groups coupling the (subliminal) effect that such basic deceptions, even commonplace, become overlook-able/ed and misappropriated to normatively violating attributes that would otherwise not be tolerated. What may be said is it, “comes down to,” the upholding regulated self-monitoring affirmation avoiding dissonance on the personal level as base of society, respected distances and separations established by private property and protection of the integrity of a (society’s), “family unit,” providing distinction from the group to reduced conflicts.
_____________
*Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior
By Alfred John Frost, Robert Rougelot Prechter (Jr.)
